Recognizing racial discrimination in the workplace, P.2

In our last post, we began looking at some of the basics of how discrimination looks in the workplace, from a legal perspective. As we noted, there are two basic categories of illegal discrimination: disparate treatment and disparate impact. We’ve already pointed out that disparate treatment refers to situations where the employer has a racial motive in making an employment decision.

Disparate impact is different in that it involves situations where the employer may not have had a racial motive, but nevertheless established, implemented or administered a workplace policy or procedure which had a discriminatory effect on workers based on race, or some other protected characteristic. Disparate impact can apply to criteria used in any aspect of employment, including: recruitment; hiring and promotion; layoffs and termination; appearance and grooming standards; education and experience requirements; and employment tests. Any one of these sets of sets of criteria can potentially have a discriminatory effect, whether intended or not. 

While statistical analysis can potentially play a role in disparate treatment claims, it is always an important aspect of making a solid claim for disparate impact. Demonstrating disparate impact involves a series of burdens of proof which shift back and forth between the parties, the first of which belongs to the plaintiff.

First of all, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 requires statistical demonstration that the specific workplace practice or policy in question caused a significant disparate impact based on race or another protected characteristic. If a plaintiff is able to demonstrate this, the employer has the opportunity to prove that the practice is job-related and based upon business necessity. If the employer is successful in so proving, the plaintiff then has the opportunity to demonstrate that a less discriminatory alternative exists which meets the business need, but that the employer failed to adopt it.

Those who feel they have been subjected to racial discrimination in the workplace should get in contact with an experienced attorney to receive guidance about the process for seeking relief. This process begins with filing a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. We’ll pick up on this topic in a future post. 

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
Free Consultation

Get Started With Your Free, No-Obligation Consultation

Let us be clear when we say "you pay us nothing unless we win." Your relationship with our law firm begins with a free consultation. You meet directly with one of our experienced lawyers. When you become our client, we never ask you to open your checkbook. We work on a contingency-fee basis, which means our fee only comes from the proceeds from a successful verdict or settlement.

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

McCune Zenner Happell, PLLC The Parklane Building, 5200 Maryland Way Suite 120 Brentwood, TN 37027 Phone: 615-953-8337 Phone: 615-425-3476 Fax: 615-251-6958 Brentwood Law Office Map

Review Us
  • The National Trial Lawyers Top 100 Trial Lawyers
  • Super Lawyers
  • The Best Lawyers in America
  • Best Lawyers Best Law Firms U S News
  • Nation's Premier NAFBA Top Ten Ranking 2014